BB: Nooooo! The front page of J.Crew right now features the 'people
(children) of color as props' advertising trope. AND, of course, they're children, so it brings up that whole colonialism/paternalism
JF: I agree this is a huge disappointment for jcrew I really expect more from them. But at least they're better than Anthropology and free people's catalogs. I eagerly flip through them each month to marvel at how 'post racial' our country has become.
KJ: Oh hey! Sol's also on a trip through Indonesia right now (though not Bali, afaik). We'll have to ask him how post-racial the country is and see whether he found any of the colorful children of Ubud to use as photo props too.
Definitely fishy business going on here. Screenshot @ 5/18/12 at 12:33 AM from http://www.jcrew.com/AST/Navigation/bali_adventure.jsp
The 'fun and fancy-free' tilt, pictured below, to these photos scattered thereabout gives it a travelogue feel. Or is it that, white-contact-colonialism feel? You tell me. Whatever it is, boy it sure is exotic! But wait a minute--why are there a few more non-white (J)Crew that aren't the main characters of this adventure? Perhaps it must be an aesthetic choice, since it would not be exotic enough to have *all* the people in the picture be brown.
|Screenshot taken 5/18/12 from http://www.jcrew.com/AST/Navigation/bali_adventure.jsp#/13|
In 2012, I think it should be clear to America, J. Crew, and whosoever is making these advertising images, that:
- there are more people than white people that shop at J. Crew
- there are people of every color who could go to Bali
- there are brown people everywhere, and they don't have to wear exotic costumes to be valid brown people.
- putting a bunch of brown ethnic people in their traditional context to offset the modernity of the white protagonists is PLAYED OUT.
While upon further inspection of the Bali Adventure it appears that J. Crew did a bunch of cultural research (in order to sell exotically themed clothing, or at least, clothing that looks good on tourists/modern people going on a safari adventure). Don't get me wrong. I am all about cultural exploration and appreciation, but what is the line between exploitation and education here?
I might add there are two/three(?) images of a woman of ambiguous beautifully brown skin tone sporting J. Crew clothes, however--
It is telling that with all the photo shoot objects pictured, the clothing accentuates how modern and boring/white the tourists are, while the lifestyle accessories (The Culture of Bali--flowers, Spirituality, Mangosteen a.k.a. candy) remain exotic as ever. Oh, haha! Look at us evoke the colonial past! Isn't that so wonderfully modern?
Not really: "In 1597 the Dutch explorer Cornelis de Houtman arrived at Bali and, with the establishment of the Dutch East India Company in 1602, the stage was set for colonial control two and a half centuries later when Dutch control expanded across the Indonesian archipelago throughout the second half of the nineteenth century...Dutch political and economic control over Bali began in the 1840s on the island's north coast, when the Dutch pitted various distrustful Balinese realms against each other. In the late 1890s, struggles between Balinese kingdoms in the island's south were exploited by the Dutch to increase their control."
Way to reach back to historical roots, J. Crew! What a throwback.
For now I'm sticking with Macy's.